mtsamis wrote: Thanks for the additional context.
I cannot comment on how easy it'll be to backport, but the reason I brought this up is because the version in the release candidate is in a in-between state of these improvements. The lack of a replacement for `RegionSuccessor()` (which as far as I understand is not really equivalent to `RegionSuccessor(getOperation(), getOperation()->getResults())` has been slightly confusing in comparison to `RegionSuccessor::parent()` which is straightforward. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/174945 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
