https://github.com/zeyi2 commented:
Hi there, A small process note: The PR description seems to be AI-generated? (apology if not) If AI is used, please disclose it in the PR description :) We have an AI policy here: https://llvm.org/docs/AIToolPolicy.html --- I previously suggested not skipping generic lambdas entirely because it causes false negatives. I notice that you still keep the skipping approach in the current fix. IMO skipping generic lambda is more of a temp workaround. Here is a small patch that contains some of the logic, you can use it as a reference for your implementation: [draft.patch](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25267050/draft.patch) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179051 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
