felipepiovezan wrote:

Sorry, I just landed here without much context. I guess my main feedback is 
that we're lacking documentation for the problem and the current solution. As 
someone who doesn't have context trying to understand the problem and the 
proposed solution, the only path is reading the entire PR (which is fine for 
reviewing, but probably not for posteriority).  Trying to reconcile the PR 
description -- which is what will be preserved in the git history -- with the 
current implementation, it seems like they don't match, right? It would be 
great if we could either update the PR description, or document the design of 
this somewhere, especially because  we're creating a new attribute.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167666
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to