yaxunl marked 6 inline comments as done. yaxunl added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11846 // an address space. if (T.getAddressSpace() != 0) { // OpenCL allows function arguments declared to be an array of a type ---------------- Anastasia wrote: > yaxunl wrote: > > Anastasia wrote: > > > yaxunl wrote: > > > > Anastasia wrote: > > > > > Could we use `LangAS::Default` here too? > > > > done > > > Sorry, I wasn't clear. I think we could have: > > > > > > if (T.getAddressSpace() != LangAS::Default && T.getAddressSpace() != > > > LangAS::opencl_private) > > > > > > and then original condition. It is a bit clearer I think. > > No. For OpenCL, the condition is on line 11847 and 11848. An array type in > > other address spaces is allowed. > I think the initial condition was `T.getAddressSpace() != 0` i.e. if not > private address space. > > So now since we added private this should be `T.getAddressSpace() > !=LangAS::opencl_private` but we can have the default case as well hence > 'T.getAddressSpace() !=LangAS::opencl_private || T.getAddressSpace() > !=LangAS::Default'. > > This entire case seems to be for OpenCL anyways. So you could also move out > the OpenCL check if you prefer. I am just trying to see if we can make this > easier to understand. This is not just for OpenCL. The condition expresses the following logic: For non-OpenCL languages, only default addr space is allowed on function argument. For OpenCL, for array type argument, any addr space is allowed; for non-array type argument, only private addr space is allowed. https://reviews.llvm.org/D35082 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits