firewave wrote: > > IMO this belongs into `performance-inefficient-string-concatenation`. > > +1 on this if it's not hard to do inside that check
Please note that check is a bit broken right now though and should not be enabled, so nobody might benefit from this improvement. See #54526, #29206 and #59478. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/182697 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
