================ @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@ +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "MissingEndComparisonCheck.h" +#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h" +#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h" +#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h" +#include "clang/Tooling/FixIt.h" + +using namespace clang::ast_matchers; + +namespace clang::tidy::bugprone { + +namespace { + +constexpr llvm::StringRef IteratorAlgorithms[] = { + "::std::find", "::std::find_if", + "::std::find_if_not", "::std::search", + "::std::search_n", "::std::find_end", + "::std::find_first_of", "::std::lower_bound", + "::std::upper_bound", "::std::partition_point", + "::std::min_element", "::std::max_element", + "::std::adjacent_find", "::std::is_sorted_until"}; + +constexpr llvm::StringRef RangeAlgorithms[] = { + "::std::ranges::find", "::std::ranges::find_if", + "::std::ranges::find_if_not", "::std::ranges::lower_bound", + "::std::ranges::upper_bound", "::std::ranges::min_element", + "::std::ranges::max_element", "::std::ranges::find_first_of", + "::std::ranges::adjacent_find", "::std::ranges::is_sorted_until"}; ---------------- zeyi2 wrote:
I exclude these algorithms on purpose: `std::search_n` returns an iterator, while `std::ranges::search_n` returns a `std::ranges::subrange`. And writing `if (result)` where result is a `subrange` is correct C++20 code. So IMHO flagging it would be a false positive. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/182543 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
