Z3rox-dev wrote: > No. > > The LLVM project requires: > > (1) You state whether you used an LLM to produce a PR (2) You indicate what > parts of the PR were produced (3) You have reviewed and confirmed that the > LLM produced code is correct > > This PR does not do 1 or 2, and you did not do 3. > > The report says it adds null check assertions. > > It does not. > > It makes incorrect changes from getAs<> to cast<> which frequently (if not > always) has different semantics. Even if cast<> was the correct semantic > change for getting a null check the correct change would have been to > castAs<>. > > GH only gives me the option to respond with "Request Changes", but it should > be closed as incorrect by design.
I apologize for missing the LLVM policy regarding explicit AI-generated code disclosure. I closed the PR and updated the main description to explicitly flag the uncontrolled use of AI. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/181167 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
