NagyDonat wrote: The open source evaluation completed (a few days ago, I just forgot about it...) and it is satisfactory. Over the analyzed projects this checker produces only two reports (`va_arg` is a rarely used language feature) and they appear to be true positives: [(one)](https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/Default/report-detail?diff-type=New&is-unique=off&report-hash=2d3c1dd20a24014dde8d6b090e1ce98b&report-id=7868301&report-filepath=curl%2Flib%2Feasy.c) [(two)](https://codechecker-demo.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com/Default/report-detail?diff-type=New&is-unique=off&report-hash=65c74f2dce4b6625bd1d9a69a1ab0194&report-id=7869606&report-filepath=twin%2Flibs%2Flibtw%2Flibtw.c).
Based on these results and the reviews, I'm merging this PR. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/175602 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
