AaronBallman wrote: > We have Clang LGTM from @AaronBallman and LLVM LGTM from @bwendling. I've > rebased and squashed to keep this up-to-date. Are we ready to go on this? Are > people okay with the ~1% memory overhead induced from this feature being > on-by-default? We can always add a flag if this is a non-starter.
I think ~1% memory overhead is acceptable given the benefits but I've added @nikic to the review for more opinions from a different perspective. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/174892 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
