Michael137 wrote: > There are a few follow up performance improvements I've tried to get in (i.e. > #164608), but there was little interest from the team in those PRs.
The patch improves things slightly (around 14%) on my test-case. But the performance regression is still quite sizeable. I realise we have an escape hatch with `-debug-info-macro-expansion-loc` (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/174895), so we might be able to work around that for now. But ideally we'd get to the bottom of the regression since it's turned on by default. Will see if I can find something https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163982 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
