================
@@ -179,6 +179,31 @@ bool X86TargetInfo::initFeatureMap(
       continue;
     }
 
+    // Expand apxf to the individual APX features
----------------
mikolaj-pirog wrote:

I believe it shouldn't. I realize it's quite awkward to not have symmetry 
between -no-apxf and -apxf but at the same time I believe -no option gives us 
lesser mandate to exclude features than positive option. I just would be 
incredibly confused if -no-apxf didn't disable everything

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/184078
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to