hans added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26764#855791, @eugenis wrote:
> IMHO it was a very bad idea to include the "architecture name" (not even a > target triple!) in the library path in the first place. No one else does > that. GCC made the right choice and called theirs "libasan.so". > > My plan is to tweak the code that sets the library name to use i686 when the > target is i386 and the os is android, both in compiler-rt and in clang. There > will be no duplicate targets. Sounds good to me. Let me know if you think this will take a while and we should revert to green in the meantime. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D26764 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
