github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp --
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/UseTrailingReturnTypeCheck.cpp
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/modernize/use-trailing-return-type.cpp
--diff_from_common_commit
``````````
:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git
a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/UseTrailingReturnTypeCheck.cpp
b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/UseTrailingReturnTypeCheck.cpp
index 32aec60da..ea43cd6c4 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/UseTrailingReturnTypeCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/UseTrailingReturnTypeCheck.cpp
@@ -269,9 +269,8 @@ classifyTokensBeforeFunctionName(const FunctionDecl &F,
const ASTContext &Ctx,
if (Info.hasMacroDefinition()) {
const MacroInfo *MI = PP->getMacroInfo(&Info);
- if (!MI || MI->isFunctionLike() || MI->isBuiltinMacro()) {
+ if (!MI || MI->isFunctionLike() || MI->isBuiltinMacro())
return std::nullopt;
- }
}
T.setIdentifierInfo(&Info);
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/184022
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
