lebedev.ri added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D36892#856501, @JonasToth wrote:
> Note can be handled right now as well. Yes. Adding this new prefix is about adding `-implicit-check-not=notes`. I.e. if you use `CHECK-MESSAGES`, then it will only enforce you to have check-lines for all the `error: ` and `warning: ` the check outputs. It does *not* enforce that all the `note: ` are to be handled. `CHECK-NOTES` however would enforce that. > E.g. > > // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-2]]:3: note: type deduction did not result in an > owner > > would the patch handle the codelocation correctly? I'm not sure what is the question to be honest. This does not change anything about codelocation handling Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D36892 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
