nikic wrote: I guess that also goes to the wider @llvm/clang-area-team. I'd like to have it established that, as a matter of policy, clang binaries should be named `clang-*`, unless grandfathered in, or there is compelling reason to use different naming.
The fact that we have a bunch of binaries with names like `pp-trace` or `hmaptool` that no reasonable person could even guess are part of clang is a historical artifact we should not seek to emulate for new additions. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/185631 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
