kzhuravl wrote: > I think what we need is a full CQE against a version of LLVM with all __fp16 > to _Float16, then we will have a good idea of what will be broken in the next > bulk promotion. Like I mentioned earlier, this revert will not resolve the > issue that downstream code is relying on implicit type conversion. We fix CK > build now but everything replying on implicit type conversion, such as RCCL, > will fail the moment we do bulk promotion, if they don't fix them ahead of > time. They will not know this if they don't use the latest upstream LLVM or > our ROCm's new main fork.
I very much second / support this. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/185861 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
