steakhal wrote: > > Personally, I didn't feel it's necessary because `clang` is already present > > in the path name - but we could come back and rename the directory sure. > > I'll come back to address this. > > `clang-sycl-linker` seem pretty similar name-wise and it's in > clang/tools/clang-sycl-linker. Might be nice if things were consistent? > > (But I don't feel all that strongly.)
No doubt. There are plenty of similarly named directories. I'll do it, dw. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/185631 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
