================
@@ -530,6 +530,43 @@ def test_pretty(self):
pp.set_property(PrintingPolicyProperty.SuppressTagKeyword, False)
self.assertEqual(f.type.get_canonical().pretty_printed(pp), "struct X")
+ def test_non_reference(self):
+ source = """
+ int dummy;
+ int &reference;
+ """
+ tu = get_tu(source, lang="cpp")
+ dummy = get_cursor(tu, "dummy")
+ reference = get_cursor(tu, "reference")
+ self.assertEqual(reference.type.get_non_reference().spelling, "int")
+ self.assertEqual(dummy.type.spelling,
dummy.type.get_non_reference().spelling)
+
+ def test_unqualified(self):
----------------
Endilll wrote:
If you look at
[documentation](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/8b9be7f685c371706171b603f2a96de53ef833b6/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeBase.h#L1233-L1255)
for `clang::QualType::GetUnqualifiedType()`, there are number of quirk to that
function, namely:
- looking through typedefs if they add qualifiers,
- `_Atomic` is ignored,
- arrays have special handling.
They should be reflected in both tests and docstring of the new function.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/175534
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
