NoQ added a comment. Cool. Thanks!
> In the future probably it would be better to alter the signature of the > checkers' constructor to set the name in the constructor so it is possible to > create the BugType eagerly. Still, should we add an assertion so that we could be sure that every bug type contains a checker name? Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D37437 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
