philnik777 wrote: > Needed after #172285. > > @philnik777, do you think #172285 is worth it, given that we apparently have > to do this change in clang to make it work?
I think it's worth it, but I'm not against adding a workaround include for the compilers with this bug. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/187347 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
