NagyDonat wrote: > Have you explored teaching the relevant checker to not raise the issues? > I'm surprised that we need to change the engine to achieve this.
@steakhal I'm not opposed to handling this in the checkers, but if this is indeed an established idiom, then I think that this single change in the engine is a better approach than suppressing this in the relevant checker(s)... and later adding more suppressions if it turns out that this affects other checkers as well. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/187530 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
