Sirraide wrote:

> Hi @Sirraide , it seems clang rejects valid after this revision. See 
> [godbolt](https://godbolt.org/z/d87zjcvhE)

How did I not check for dependent types... and more importantly how is it that 
we didn’t have tests for that... I’ll fix this and add some tests

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/187828
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to