avikivity wrote: > > I could feed your feedback to the AI, but then I just become a conduit > > between you. I don't mind doing that but I don't think it's effective. I > > just don't have sufficient understanding of the codebase. > > @avikivity this depends on what you want to do, > > if you just want to provide a issue report and some hints to compiler > developers, I think you've done a great job. It indeed helped me to > understand the problem sooner. > > But if you want to contribute the project directly, according to our AI > policy (https://llvm.org/docs/AIToolPolicy.html), you have to understand what > you send.
I cannot claim to have a deep understanding, or even shallow, of the changes. They are too complicated for me to follow without a deep study of the code. If the AI generated changes are not helpful, I'll close this pull request. In my opinion, they are useful at least as a hint of what a change would look like. btw, I encountered two more issues related to module support, and AI successfully solved them (although, perhaps not in an acceptable way). I planned to file them once we made progress here, I can file them earlier, with or without the proposed fix, whichever you prefer. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/188865 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
