jmgorius wrote:

Thanks @RKSimon !

Would it make sense to open more PRs if I come across inconsistent types in the 
x86 builtins? I found a few that, e.g., should semantically operate on unsigned 
values but take vectors of signed values instead (`packuswb128` comes to mind).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/189254
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to