yxsamliu wrote: > > > @YonahGoldberg gentle ping — the regression is fixed and the new > > > benchmark run looks clean. Any further concerns, or is this good to go? > > > > > > Do we not care about the regression in neatosplines.ll? Looks like there's > > some extra unnecessary vectorization that happens. > > Got latest up-to-date result: > [dtcxzyw/llvm-opt-benchmark-nightly#64](https://github.com/dtcxzyw/llvm-opt-benchmark-nightly/pull/64)
we got rid of the regression but also lost some optimizations. I will try recovering them. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165159 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
