compnerd wrote: > > Does it have measured perf implications that we should consider? > > I haven't measured, however, accessing `Registry<T>` shouldn't be in a > hot-path, so I think there is no major impact. For build-time, `Registry<T>` > itself is a quite simple template, and I don't think so many TUs instantiate > it with the same parameters, so I guess it's not significant.
Sorry about not being clear, I meant compile time performance implications, i.e. does this change the compile times/sizes meaningfully for MSVC, clang, or gcc? That is fair, it it is a pretty simple member, so it shouldn't be too expensive to materialise, but the problem is on the linking side where the deduplication needs to occur. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/185141 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
