eiytoq wrote: @efriedma-quic
> The test coverage here seems deficient: nothing is actually checking that the > mangling that was causing the crash. Could you clarify what exact mangling you think the test should check? > Also, for the names that are covered, the mangling seems to be inconsistent > with gcc. The GCC mismatch looks pre-existing, so I think it should be handled separately. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/181068 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
