llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> I've run into a problem in a branch lately that would've benefitted from this assertion. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/189972.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpFrame.cpp (+1) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpFrame.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpFrame.cpp index 0d429e773f88f..1c7d65dc28e02 100644 --- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpFrame.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpFrame.cpp @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ void InterpFrame::initScope(unsigned Idx) { return; for (auto &Local : Func->getScope(Idx).locals()) { + assert(!localBlock(Local.Offset)->isInitialized()); localBlock(Local.Offset)->invokeCtor(); } } `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/189972 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
