================
@@ -18517,6 +18560,23 @@ EvaluateComparisonBinaryOperator(EvalInfo &Info, const
BinaryOperator *E,
return Success(CmpResult::Equal, E);
}
+ if (LHSTy->isMetaInfoType() && RHSTy->isMetaInfoType()) {
+ APValue LHSValue, RHSValue;
+ llvm::FoldingSetNodeID LID, RID;
+ if (!Evaluate(LHSValue, Info, E->getLHS()))
+ return false;
+ LHSValue.Profile(LID);
+
----------------
tbaederr wrote:
Seems like it would be more idiomatic to compare the contents of the apvalues
directly here. Or are you doing this because they can be of different type? Are
LHS/RHS not always reflect apvalues?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190356
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
