devajithvs wrote: If a null-check is not ideal. I'm ok with reverting this patch.
The downside is that `clang-repl` wouldn't print the actual type. We might also need to revert this: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/187725, which is similar to what this patch does. I also found that we can trigger the assertion also with `UnaryTransformType`, and I think this might not be the last. Maybe we should replace the assert with a safe fallback regardless of what we do? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/186105 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
