topperc wrote: > > Do we want a difference between `__riscv_v_intrinsic_*` and > > `__riscv_intrinsic_*`? > > Umm that's what I was thinking earlier when I unified them, my thought of > unifying them is to keep simplicity. When we distinguish scalar and vector > with different suffix, we might also need additional set to distinguish > vendor extensions, e.g. `__riscv_vendor_v_intrinsic_` and > `__riscv_vendor_intrinsic_` which is more explicit but somehow make it more > complex. I have no strong option though lol
Wouldn't vendor extensions be `__riscv_intrinsic_x*? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/187197 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
