xlauko wrote: > Side note: WDYT about the comment I made about `Fundamental` type above? I > realize my comment seemed to have caused the merge to happen automatically, > but I was a bit surprised it didn't come up before.
I agree with you there we should consolidate it. Depends what we mean by `fundamental` type even, I guess we should follow standard and what AST/fronend considers fundamental type: - According to core wording of https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2026/p3666r3.html it will be considered fundamental. - AST: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/73e2b0e64186e2386d777e936c92bb25a995a0f4/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeBase.h#L8631 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/188113 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
