aengelke wrote:

FWIW, using the emplace_back append for non-random-access iterators is slightly 
negative in c-t-t stage1 builds and slightly positive in c-t-t stage2 builds... 
[c-t-t](https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=a602927e3605d213caadfe3c63a619702b042aae&to=d2caebd062fe1f2cab8323a7946a9f9d3fe0c37e&stat=instructions:u).
 Not sure whether we should change that.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/191030
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to