thakis added a comment. I think for depfile generation, we generally try to be gcc-compatible (I can link to prior changes in this spirit), so I think this seems like a good thing to do to me. gcc only does this for system headers, yes?
Does gcc support the non-negated spelling of this flag (-f-canonical-system-headers) too? If so, we should probably support that too for completeness, even if specifying it explicitly won't change behavior. https://reviews.llvm.org/D37954 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
