hubert-reinterpretcast wrote: > I have an idea how to make this progr_e_ss. How about extracting the option > handling in a separate PR? I guess this is the less controversial change and > could be landed independently. That is, add the `-fexec-charset` option, > process it and pass from the driver to the compiler, which will define > `__clang_literal_encoding`, and that's all. This will also ensure that the > driver/preprocessor changes have good test coverage.
I agree that splitting will help the review; however, I don't think we should land the driver part _first_. It should probably be added last. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138895 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
