================
@@ -1,30 +1,91 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
-
-void f1() {
- struct X {
- struct Y;
- };
-
- struct X::Y {
- void f() {}
- };
-}
-
-void f2() {
- struct X {
- struct Y;
-
- struct Y {
- void f() {}
- };
- };
-}
-
-// A class nested within a local class is a local class.
-void f3(int a) { // expected-note{{'a' declared here}}
- struct X {
- struct Y {
- int f() { return a; } // expected-error{{reference to local variable 'a'
declared in enclosing function 'f3'}}
- };
- };
-}
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
----------------
Endilll wrote:
Can you switch this test to `-verify-directives`? In general I think this test
would benefit from C++ DR test conventions, like `@-1`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/197863
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
