abhina-sree wrote: > @abhina-sree @hubert-reinterpretcast @s-barannikov > > Here is a suggestion: lets try to reach completion on this PR and land it, > then go through the 2-3 follow up that are open, and then (and only then) we > can decide to land or not the driver changes (and documentation) > > The logic is that until there is a driver option, as long as the changes do > not cause regressions we can land part of the feature and iterate piece-meal. > Hopefully that remove the pressure of a fast-approaching branch date. > > Sounds good?
Thanks, sounds good to me! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138895 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
