rjmccall added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D37826#888086, @kosarev wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D37826#887820, @rjmccall wrote: > > > I assume I should wait on reviewing this until all of these smaller TBAA > > patches land? > > > These small patches are actually part of this diff. Generally, It depends on > how you would like it: if you can review this re-based version as a whole, > then that would save us some time. > > Otherwise, you may want to proceed by smaller pieces, in which case > https://reviews.llvm.org/D38503 is the next proposed piece to review. > > Alternatively, if https://reviews.llvm.org/D38503 looks too complicated, > please let me know and I will break it down into even smaller patches. > > Or, if acceptable, I could commit a series of really small and simple diffs > that all result in what is presented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D38126 and > rely on post-commit reviews. > > I'm fine with either way, provided the changes go to the mainline in time > manner. > > Thanks a lot for reviewing! I'll let you rebase this on top of the https://reviews.llvm.org/D38503 when you commit it, and then I'll just review this directly. Thanks a lot for splitting it up! John. https://reviews.llvm.org/D37826 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
