================
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/Checker.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "AllocationState.h"
+#include "clang/Analysis/Analyses/LifetimeSafety/LifetimeAnnotations.h"
+
+
+using namespace clang;
+using namespace ento;
+using namespace clang::lifetimes;
+
+REGISTER_MAP_WITH_PROGRAMSTATE(LifetimeBoundMap, SymbolRef,
+ const MemRegion *);
+
+class LifetimeAnnotations : public Checker<check::PostCall> {
+public:
+ void checkPostCall(const CallEvent &Call, CheckerContext &C) const;
+ void printState(raw_ostream &Out, ProgramStateRef State, const char *NL,
+ const char *Sep) const override;
+};
+
+void LifetimeAnnotations::checkPostCall(const CallEvent &Call,
+ CheckerContext &C) const {
+ ProgramStateRef State = C.getState();
+
+ const auto *FC = dyn_cast_if_present<AnyFunctionCall>(&Call);
+ if (!FC)
+ return;
+
+ const FunctionDecl *FD = FC->getDecl();
+ if (!FD)
+ return;
+
+ unsigned LBParamIdx = FD->getNumParams();
+ // FIXME: Use range based for loop instead. Currently that would require
+ // to also change how we create ArgVal which would need a new logic to
+ // be implemented.
+ for (unsigned I = 0, E = FD->getNumParams(); I != E; I++) {
+ if (FD->getParamDecl(I)->hasAttr<LifetimeBoundAttr>()) {
----------------
benedekaibas wrote:
Yes, I have started working on that as well since that annotation should be
visible in the `ExplodedGraph` as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/200145
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
