jakos-sec wrote: > I don't think there's any reason to avoid using a header, in general, > assuming it gets installed somewhere appropriate. Well, as long as you're > sure the compiler doesn't need to do anything special with the function. It > look like there's some special handling related to > `__safestack_get_unsafe_stack_ptr` in the backend.
I've added `__safestack_get_unsafe_stack_ptr` in this commit and it's only used in a test. There shouldn't be any other use of it in the backend, if I'm not mistaken. > This should also come with a release note in clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst to > alert users to the deprecation. Also added that, thank you for the suggestion. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/198292 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
