kkwli wrote: > > @tarunprabhu @kiranchandramohan AFAIK, `ClangExecutable` is not overridden > > anywhere. If Since `ClangExecutable` is not clang specific, is it > > reasonable to rename it to, say, `DriverExecutable` to avoid any confusion? > > I think that is reasonable. We would also need to get approval from the clang > driver maintainers in that case.
@tarunprabhu @kiranchandramohan I post https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/200814 to rename `ClangExecutable` and `getClangProgramPath`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/200438 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
