https://github.com/jcranmer-intel commented:

I haven't looked at the results for numerical correctness, so far I've just 
been making sure that expressions are non-constexpr when they produce signals.

The AST-based constexpr evaluator does such a bad job of producing this 
behavior that I haven't noted all of its failures; it looks to me that the 
helper method you expect to cause bailout on exception behavior doesn't 
actually do that. So for the most part, the comments are focused on the 
bytecode interpreter, which catches some but not all of the cases.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/194327
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to