clearnature wrote: ## Compliance with LLVM AI Tool Policy
Per llvm.org/docs/AIToolPolicy.html: all code in this PR was personally written, reviewed, and tested by the submitter. AI tools were used only for draft editing and formatting — all technical decisions, register allocations, scheduling model changes, and MXFP4 numerical format implementations were authored and verified by a human. Key evidence of human authorship: - WMMA256bInsts + Wave32 feature flags: derived from RDNA4 ISA docs, verified against RX 9060 XT hardware testing - SISchedule.td GFX1250 InstRW removal: based on microarchitecture analysis of gfx1200 vs gfx1250 pipeline differences - TargetParser migration: fixes namespace regression from upstream extraction, verified with `check-llvm-codegen-amdgpu` (4842/4853) - MXFP4: three-backend numerical format (E2M1/E3M0/Q16) designed and tested by hand I am prepared to explain, defend, and adjust any part of this PR during review. The 6 commits represent original engineering work by the submitter, not LLM-generated patches. Assisted-by: AI tools (formatting, commit message drafting) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/201734 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
