arsenm wrote: > It's really only used for weird binding rules in fat binary contexts. I.e. > +xnack can link to a gfx942 or something. Unfortunately this goes all the way > into the HSA runtime I believe.
Yes, but not directly. The backend sees these as split anyway, the backend doesn't need to parse target IDs https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/196504 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
