NeKon69 wrote:
> Do we still warn on the primary template here:
>
> ```
> template <typename T>
> T &foo(T &obj) { return obj; }
>
> // later: f(x); where x is int.
> ```
>
> ?
I believe so. There's a test for that in:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e26e9ba06f46f9619bb6d2df40850a54559640ce/clang/test/Sema/LifetimeSafety/annotation-suggestions.cpp#L401-L409
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/203866
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
