elizabethandrews wrote: > Thanks @elizabethandrews, I think this looks great! I noted one place where > I'm not sure if a change that was made is still needed. I'll follow up with > documentation suggestions as we discussed (probably not today though).
Thanks for the review @tahonermann. Will the current documentation suffice for this PR? If so, I could open this up for review and you could do a follow-up PR with more documentation. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/200849 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
