cyndyishida wrote:

> Is there a new push to use radr links more consistently or was this a one-off 
> request?

The latter, I suppose.  There's improved release management automation 
downstream, but no specific push to increase the presence of rdar links. 
Tracking changes to our downstream release is the biggest reason I add it, and 
would encourage others to do so when it's applicable.

> so we don't end up in a bad place again by accident.

👍 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/182722
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to