================
@@ -2686,6 +2686,30 @@ Value *CodeGenFunction::EmitX86BuiltinExpr(unsigned
BuiltinID,
return EmitX86MaskedCompareResult(*this, Shufbit, NumElts, MaskIn);
}
+ case X86::BI__builtin_ia32_bmacor16x16x16_v16hi:
+ case X86::BI__builtin_ia32_bmacor16x16x16_v32hi:
+ case X86::BI__builtin_ia32_bmacxor16x16x16_v16hi:
+ case X86::BI__builtin_ia32_bmacxor16x16x16_v32hi: {
+ Intrinsic::ID ID;
+ switch (BuiltinID) {
+ case X86::BI__builtin_ia32_bmacor16x16x16_v16hi:
+ ID = Intrinsic::x86_avx512_vbmacor_v16hi;
+ break;
+ case X86::BI__builtin_ia32_bmacor16x16x16_v32hi:
+ ID = Intrinsic::x86_avx512_vbmacor_v32hi;
+ break;
+ case X86::BI__builtin_ia32_bmacxor16x16x16_v16hi:
+ ID = Intrinsic::x86_avx512_vbmacxor_v16hi;
+ break;
+ case X86::BI__builtin_ia32_bmacxor16x16x16_v32hi:
+ ID = Intrinsic::x86_avx512_vbmacxor_v32hi;
+ break;
+ default:
+ llvm_unreachable("Unsupported intrinsic!");
+ }
+
+ return Builder.CreateCall(CGM.getIntrinsic(ID), Ops);
----------------
RKSimon wrote:
Can you not use ClangBuiltin tags in the IntrinsicsX86.td to avoid this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/182556
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
