ssahasra wrote: > The `$custom` handling is removed now. > > > But you could do it in some required IR pass that is part of the codegen > > pipeline, like ExpandIRInsts? Just to avoid duplicating the checks between > > the two different isel frameworks. > > Well, I don't think other IR passes are the right place for diagnostics and > error reporting. If we want that, we'd probably need another pass similar to > the Verifier, but with access to backend-specific information. > > That could be a reasonable follow-up if we decide we really want to go in > that direction.
Yes, I would be interested in that direction. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/201470 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
