AaronBallman wrote:

> Do we want to mention C23 reproducible/unsequenced? (I know we haven't 
> implemented them yet, but it's a useful point of comparison.)

I figured we would mention those if we ever elected to support them. (Right now 
there are no plans to support those standard attributes due to them being type 
attributes, but we might support the GCC extension allowing them as declaration 
attributes, but that's orthogonal to this PR.)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/205881
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to